Connect with us

Politics

Navy SEALS using religious exemptions to avoid vaccine requirement are being intimidated and harassed

Published

on

The Navy is using demotions, pay cuts and travel prohibition for SEALS who have religious objections to receiving the vaccine

A developing number of U.S. Navy SEALS who are using a religious exemption to the Department of Defense’s (DOD) COVID-19 vaccine requirement are being threatened, and harassed into conforming, Fox News has discovered.

A progression of new orders by the Navy are promising extreme discipline, including downgrades, pay cuts and a restriction on travel for SEALS, and other Navy administration individuals, who don’t follow the vaccine mandate. For SEALS who are currently seeking a religious exemption to the requirement, the process is almost impossible to effectively complete to get a waiver, Fox News has been told.

Michael Berry, First Liberty Institute’s overall advice and Lt. Col. U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, who is addressing roughly 34 well-trained SEALS and two reservists, let Fox News know that the Navy’s new orders are illicit and encroach upon First Amendment freedoms.

“Purging our military of its elite servicemembers is detrimental to national security. Doing so because the Commander in Chief refuses to accommodate their religious convictions is abhorrent to the Constitution. Their years of experience and leadership in service to our nation is immeasurable and irreplaceable,” Berry told Fox News.

Berry proceeded, “Remove a SEAL from special warfare, reduce his salary, and force him to repay his training is purely vindictive and punitive. And it’s illegal. They have nothing to do with a virus.” Berry’s customers have a joined amount of more than 350 years of military service and more than 100 combat deployments.

Another order by the Navy’s COVID Consolidated Disposition Authority (CCDA) gave yesterday expresses that if SEALs decline the vaccine, the Navy may seek to retrieve from every individual SEAL the money the government has spent on training them. For an individual SEAL, the training costs alone is assessed to adding up to a few million dollars.

“The CCDA may seek recoupment of applicable bonuses, special and incentive pays, and the cost of training and education for service members refusing the vaccine,” reads the document.

On Oct. 6, the Navy gave an order restricting all authority and non-official travel for non-immunized help individuals and their spouses and dependents.

Another internal document investigated by Fox News expresses that SEALS, as special operations (SO) duty personnel, who decline to get the vaccine because ofreligious or personal beliefs, will be “disqualified” from SO duty. That would mean a SEAL trying to have religious exemption would lose his or her “special warfare” pay due to SO status. However, this doesn’t apply to SEALS who are using medical objections to getting the vaccine.

The Navy told administration individuals on Thursday that Nov. 14 is the cutoff time for deployment ready mariners to have either their additional opportunity of a two-portion immunization or the single shot of a one-portion antibody. Reservists have until Dec. 14.

One occurrence of badgering by a supervisorial official toward a his strict SEAL issues with the immunization seems to go against the Navy’s true explanation that all assistance individuals can look for exceptions from the order whenever wanted.

As per a source familiar, when one SEAL informed his commander that he was intending to look for a religious exemption, the official said that he would need to surrender his Special Warfare pin, otherwise called a “trident.” If a SEAL loses the privilege of wearing a Trident, the individual in question is taken out from the SEAL community group totally and sent back to be a standard mariner, notwithstanding now and again, long periods of hard procured special operator status.

Lt. Cdr. Patricia Kreuzberger let Fox News know that in spite of the fact that she was unable to talk explicitly on issues influencing the SEALS, administration individuals are entitled to seek religious exemptions to the COVID-19 vaccination mandate.

“Mandatory vaccination for our servicemembers is a lawful order that maximizes our operational effectiveness. To be world-wide deployable, Naval personnel must be medically qualified which includes being up-to-date on required vaccinations. Servicemembers are entitled to seek religious exemptions and those requests will be considered in keeping with current Navy policy.”

She likewise said that the Navy has been investigating administration individuals’ documented strict exclusions to the order on a one case at a time case premise. She would not expand on the quantity of exceptions that have been documented, dismissed or supported by the military.

The Navy said Thursday in a news discharge that more than 98% of well-trained assistance individuals have met the “readiness responsibility” by beginning or finishing a COVIV-19 vaccination series.

First Liberty plans to file a complaint soon for the SEALS utilizing pseudonyms and hiding locations in order to keep the identities of the service members safe, who fear retaliation from Navy leadership.

“SEALs have invested their lives into serving this nation, dedicating years of their lives and millions of taxpayer dollars in training to be the most elite fighting force on the face of the earth. Yet, the Commander in Chief would simply kick them out of the Navy, send them to jail, and force them to repay the nation for their training—all for simply declining a vaccine,” said Berry.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Survey shows majority of Americans reject Build Back Better: More think Biden’s infrastructure spending bill will hurt them more than help them

Published

on

In a total inversion of what Democrats had expected, Americans have dismissed the expensive framework bill with gigantic social projects incorporated into it. Another survey shows that more Americans repel the Democrats’ $1.75 trillion spending proposition than welcome it.

As indicated by another ABC News/Ipsos survey delivered on Sunday, public help for President Joe Biden’s bills to expand spending on framework and social projects has blurred.

The overview tracked down that 32% of Americans feel that the spending bills would hurt individuals like them if they became law, while 25% said they accept the bills would help them. Close to 66% (64%) of Republicans figure the bills would hurt individuals like them, and 29% of free thinkers feel something very similar. In spite of being the significant system of Biden’s administration, less than half of Democrats (47%) accept the two bills would help them.

A CBS News survey from recently tracked down that 36% of respondents said it would help them and their family versus 33% who said it would hurt their friends and family. The overview additionally said that 79% of review members said that expansion was brought about by supply and assembling issues after the pandemic and 66% said it was brought about by U.S. government strategy. “And when asked about potential causes of inflation right now, two-thirds cited U.S. government policy,” the outlet stated.

The poll showed that just 37% of Americans thought that Biden and the Democrats were centered around issues they care very much about.

This sad survey for Biden and the Democrats shows up on that very days as a NBC News review that shows the president at unsurpassed lows. The NBC News surveys found that Biden was submerged interestingly of his administration – 42% endorsement rating versus 54% who object.

The survey likewise showed that 71% said the nation is “off on the wrong track” – including 48% of Democrats.

“When you see a wrong track of 71%, it is a flashing red light,” Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies said. “These folks are telling us that this is not going well.”

That is a huge increment from one more survey in September that said 61% of Americans felt like the country has “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

Continue Reading

Politics

President Biden says the Pope advised him to continue to take communion and considered him a ‘good Catholic’

Published

on

President Joe Biden said that Pope Francis let him know he was a “good Catholic” and said he could keep on taking communion regardless of the complaints of numerous U.S. bishops.

Biden made the case after a private gathering with the pontiff at the Vatican on Friday.

“We just talked about the fact he was happy that I was a good Catholic and I should keep receiving Communion,” Biden said about the gathering.

He added that the topic of abortion didn’t come up in the gathering.

An assertion from the White House showed that Biden said thanks to the Pope for pushing for an “equitable global economic recovery” and for battling global warming.

“Biden thanked His Holiness for his advocacy for the world’s poor and those suffering from hunger, conflict, and persecution,” the assertion added.

The Vatican didn’t affirm Biden’s case in their official statement about their gathering.

Biden’s claim will probably disappoint and outrage many conservative Catholics in the U.S. who have called for communion to be declined to politicians who stand behind abortion, which is in opposition to Catholic church teaching.

The issue will be taken up by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops following upon a vote during their June plenary meeting to address it generally. After Biden met with the Pope, they delivered an assertion saying that they would not single out a particular legislator if they vote to say something about the issue.

The Pope had recently reacted to the contention by approaching the diocesans to try not to politicize the congregation’s most elevated holy observance, which would transform it into a “source of discord rather than unity within the episcopate and the larger church in the United States.”

Here’s additional info on the gathering between the Pope and Biden:

Continue Reading

Politics

Gold Star father tears into Biden over supposed arrangement to give large installments to illegal migrant families

Published

on

Gold Star father David Horton slammed President Joe Biden in a meeting Sunday, scrutinizing the Biden organization’s accounted for plan to convey huge financial installments to some migrant families.

The Wall Street Journal announced last week about the arrangement to pay migrant families affected by previous President Donald Trump’s zero-tolerance illegal immigration policies.

The Biden administration is in talks to offer immigrant families that were separated during the Trump administration around $450,000 a person in compensation, according to people familiar with the matter, as several agencies work to resolve lawsuits filed on behalf of parents and children who say the government subjected them to lasting psychological trauma.

The U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services are considering payments that could amount to close to $1 million a family, though the final numbers could shift, the people familiar with the matter said. Most of the families that crossed the border illegally from Mexico to seek asylum in the U.S. included one parent and one child, the people said. Many families would likely get smaller payouts, depending on their circumstances, the people said.

Among the issues pundits have raised with the arrangement, the greatest is that non-citizens remain to get additional cash from the U.S. government than gold star families if the arrangement becomes reality.

As of now, the U.S. government pays the group of fallen assistance individuals $100,000 in “death gratuity”; the installments are tax excluded. The families of service members additionally have the choice to gather a limit of $400,000 in extra security, however administration individuals need to pay into the protection intend to accept its advantages.

Speaking on “Fox and Friends,” Horton — whose son, Army Spc. Christopher Horton, was killed in Afghanistan in 2011 — proclaimed the Biden administration’s arrangement “an insult” and clarified it disrespects military families.

“I think it’s another — yet another insult … against our military families and Gold Star families and veterans’ families,” Horton said. “It’s just another another slap in the face. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“To compare an illegal person who has broken our country’s border laws … they’ve broken the law coming in on our borders and to compare that with someone, a patriot like my son, who gave his all on the battlefield of Afghanistan, and to just say, ‘Oh well, the value is more for someone who has broken our laws’ … and now to say, ‘Oh, we owe you money — and it’s more money than we would pay a patriot — I am outraged,” Horton said.

“You just wonder, where is the outcry against some of these policies that are just there? Unbelievable to me,” Horton added.

Continue Reading

Advertisment:

Advertisment:

Trending