Connect with us


Media traffic has shrunk since Trump moved to Mar-a-Lago



With Biden, the press puts the main target on policy debates, which most people find boring

Donald Trump was always certain of one thing: He was an enormous moneymaker for the news media.

Now they are struggling to hold onto an audience that is shrinking.

Media outlets are not necessarily collapsing, as Trump had predicted would be their outcome once he gone. It’s merely like a return to what was considered normal, before the symbiotic relationship that boosted his political fortunes and their bottom lines.

That now presents a challenge, that their world is not controlled by the politics of personality, divisive culture wars and ongoing Twitter spats anymore.

President Biden has had his share of opposition, but his effort to tone down the drama, avoid personal attacks and barely interacts with the media which puts the focus solely on policy debates, which many people find boring.

Trump didn’t singlehandedly create the high ratings and clicks of 2020 and early 2021. There was a global pandemic and an economic lockdown that drew the attention of Americans. There were times of racial protests that often turned into riots. There was a very highly contested presidential election, armed insurrection at the Capitol, and there were two impeachment trials in the space of 13 months.

The media crave crisis and controversy, Trump knew how to supply both.

At the Washington Post the number of online visitors fell twenty-six percent from January to February—and that’s reported from the Post. The New York Times site lost seventeen percent during that same period.

As for cable news:

The most effected was CNN, but Fox News and MSNBC were also effected.

The Trump presidency saw the number of Times digital subscriptions rise from 3 million to 7.5 million; the Post tripled their subscribers to 3 million. The regional newspapers didn’t get the national outlet rise.

The Trump void, if we can call it that, helps explain why there was so much media attention around the world to an interview I did on Sunday. Senior adviser Jason Miller told me on “Media Buzz” that the former president will be back on social media in two to three months with a new platform to emerge from his meetings with various companies.

Whether that materializes, or crashes and burns, remains to be seen; it isn’t easy challenging the likes of Twitter and Facebook from scratch. But while such an app or outlet would be a magnet for conservatives, journalists would also sign up en masse to follow any Trumpian news.

The 45th president just confirmed a scoop I had weeks ago, that he’s enjoying being freed from the tyranny of the torrent of tweeting. His press releases are “more elegant than tweeting,” he told Newsmax.

Trump admitted that “the tweeting gets you in trouble” because when you retweet people you can find out they’re “not so good.” He was often criticized during his White House years for serving as a megaphone for sketchy characters and conspiracy theorists.

You might think that with a new administration, an ongoing pandemic, widespread vaccine frustration and a crisis at the Texas border there would be plenty of news to attract people. But importance alone doesn’t mean it will gain popularity. At the Times yesterday, the third-most popular story was Ellen DeGeneres’ plunging ratings; the fourth most clicked-on Post story was “Prince Harry takes a job at Silicon Valley Start-Up.”

Media outlets clearly have to find something else to do now that they’ve been forced to break their Trump addiction.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Survey shows majority of Americans reject Build Back Better: More think Biden’s infrastructure spending bill will hurt them more than help them



In a total inversion of what Democrats had expected, Americans have dismissed the expensive framework bill with gigantic social projects incorporated into it. Another survey shows that more Americans repel the Democrats’ $1.75 trillion spending proposition than welcome it.

As indicated by another ABC News/Ipsos survey delivered on Sunday, public help for President Joe Biden’s bills to expand spending on framework and social projects has blurred.

The overview tracked down that 32% of Americans feel that the spending bills would hurt individuals like them if they became law, while 25% said they accept the bills would help them. Close to 66% (64%) of Republicans figure the bills would hurt individuals like them, and 29% of free thinkers feel something very similar. In spite of being the significant system of Biden’s administration, less than half of Democrats (47%) accept the two bills would help them.

A CBS News survey from recently tracked down that 36% of respondents said it would help them and their family versus 33% who said it would hurt their friends and family. The overview additionally said that 79% of review members said that expansion was brought about by supply and assembling issues after the pandemic and 66% said it was brought about by U.S. government strategy. “And when asked about potential causes of inflation right now, two-thirds cited U.S. government policy,” the outlet stated.

The poll showed that just 37% of Americans thought that Biden and the Democrats were centered around issues they care very much about.

This sad survey for Biden and the Democrats shows up on that very days as a NBC News review that shows the president at unsurpassed lows. The NBC News surveys found that Biden was submerged interestingly of his administration – 42% endorsement rating versus 54% who object.

The survey likewise showed that 71% said the nation is “off on the wrong track” – including 48% of Democrats.

“When you see a wrong track of 71%, it is a flashing red light,” Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies said. “These folks are telling us that this is not going well.”

That is a huge increment from one more survey in September that said 61% of Americans felt like the country has “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

Continue Reading


President Biden says the Pope advised him to continue to take communion and considered him a ‘good Catholic’



President Joe Biden said that Pope Francis let him know he was a “good Catholic” and said he could keep on taking communion regardless of the complaints of numerous U.S. bishops.

Biden made the case after a private gathering with the pontiff at the Vatican on Friday.

“We just talked about the fact he was happy that I was a good Catholic and I should keep receiving Communion,” Biden said about the gathering.

He added that the topic of abortion didn’t come up in the gathering.

An assertion from the White House showed that Biden said thanks to the Pope for pushing for an “equitable global economic recovery” and for battling global warming.

“Biden thanked His Holiness for his advocacy for the world’s poor and those suffering from hunger, conflict, and persecution,” the assertion added.

The Vatican didn’t affirm Biden’s case in their official statement about their gathering.

Biden’s claim will probably disappoint and outrage many conservative Catholics in the U.S. who have called for communion to be declined to politicians who stand behind abortion, which is in opposition to Catholic church teaching.

The issue will be taken up by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops following upon a vote during their June plenary meeting to address it generally. After Biden met with the Pope, they delivered an assertion saying that they would not single out a particular legislator if they vote to say something about the issue.

The Pope had recently reacted to the contention by approaching the diocesans to try not to politicize the congregation’s most elevated holy observance, which would transform it into a “source of discord rather than unity within the episcopate and the larger church in the United States.”

Here’s additional info on the gathering between the Pope and Biden:

Continue Reading


Gold Star father tears into Biden over supposed arrangement to give large installments to illegal migrant families



Gold Star father David Horton slammed President Joe Biden in a meeting Sunday, scrutinizing the Biden organization’s accounted for plan to convey huge financial installments to some migrant families.

The Wall Street Journal announced last week about the arrangement to pay migrant families affected by previous President Donald Trump’s zero-tolerance illegal immigration policies.

The Biden administration is in talks to offer immigrant families that were separated during the Trump administration around $450,000 a person in compensation, according to people familiar with the matter, as several agencies work to resolve lawsuits filed on behalf of parents and children who say the government subjected them to lasting psychological trauma.

The U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services are considering payments that could amount to close to $1 million a family, though the final numbers could shift, the people familiar with the matter said. Most of the families that crossed the border illegally from Mexico to seek asylum in the U.S. included one parent and one child, the people said. Many families would likely get smaller payouts, depending on their circumstances, the people said.

Among the issues pundits have raised with the arrangement, the greatest is that non-citizens remain to get additional cash from the U.S. government than gold star families if the arrangement becomes reality.

As of now, the U.S. government pays the group of fallen assistance individuals $100,000 in “death gratuity”; the installments are tax excluded. The families of service members additionally have the choice to gather a limit of $400,000 in extra security, however administration individuals need to pay into the protection intend to accept its advantages.

Speaking on “Fox and Friends,” Horton — whose son, Army Spc. Christopher Horton, was killed in Afghanistan in 2011 — proclaimed the Biden administration’s arrangement “an insult” and clarified it disrespects military families.

“I think it’s another — yet another insult … against our military families and Gold Star families and veterans’ families,” Horton said. “It’s just another another slap in the face. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“To compare an illegal person who has broken our country’s border laws … they’ve broken the law coming in on our borders and to compare that with someone, a patriot like my son, who gave his all on the battlefield of Afghanistan, and to just say, ‘Oh well, the value is more for someone who has broken our laws’ … and now to say, ‘Oh, we owe you money — and it’s more money than we would pay a patriot — I am outraged,” Horton said.

“You just wonder, where is the outcry against some of these policies that are just there? Unbelievable to me,” Horton added.

Continue Reading