Connect with us


House Republicans demand answers from Biden administration about unions’ ‘special treatment’



GOP reps call Biden’s waivers for union officials to serve in White House ‘classic definition’ of conflict of interest

House Republicans are concerned about former union officials who were given ethics waivers to serve within the Biden administration, claiming organized labor has excessive influence on government policy.

Top Republicans sent letters Tuesday to the Biden Administration demanding answers on a number of his political appointees who were former union officials and the circumstances all around the exemptions they were given to federal ethics rules. The union leaders were given “special treatment” to both serve in the Biden administration and communicate directly with former union employers to execute policies that might directly benefit the unions, the GOP lawmakers say.

“This is the classic definition of a conflict of interest,” the GOP reps wrote Tuesday in letters first obtained by Fox News.

The letters were written by Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Virginia Foxx, the top Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee.

They said teachers unions have already had a lot of influence and access to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on guidance for schools opening and they are now “concerned” the use of ethics waivers is a way for union leaders to invade other areas of the government.

“By appointing former union officials to positions that directly interact with their former employers, unions stand to directly benefit from Biden Administration policies,” the lawmakers continued. “This is alarming considering the devastating effect teachers unions have had on the educational prospects of so many of our nation’s children.”

The GOP members pointed at two Biden officials in their Tuesday letters.

Celeste Drake, a former official with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, was appointed to become Made in America Director at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The other is Alethea Predeoux, a former official at the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), who became Biden’s Director of the Office of Congressional, Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Comer and Foxx wrote to Shalanda Young and Kathleen McGettigan, the leaders at OMB and OPM, respectively, asking for all documents and records surrounding the ethics waivers, including communications between Drake and Predeoux and their former union employers.

“President Biden has a pattern of putting unions first and Americans last,” Comer said in a statement to Fox News. “First, he allowed a radical teachers union to dictate scientific guidance effectively keeping children locked out of their classrooms. Now, he’s granted ethics waivers to allow former union officials to wield government power on behalf of the union bosses. This is a conflict of interest, pure and simple. The Biden Administration must provide answers about these controversial appointments.”

The White House had defended the teachers’ union involvement in CDC school reopening guidance in the past claiming it’s a “longstanding best practice” for the agency to talk to multiple stakeholders who will be effected by the public health guidelines. As for the ethics waivers for the union officials, the White House has said these are necessary moves to control connections between government agencies and labor unions.

Urged about the ethics waivers in May, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Biden has stood behind unions throughout his political career.

She said the waivers are granted in “very, very limited” circumstances when is necessary and in the best interest of governing.

“I will reiterate … the president signed an executive order requiring all appointees across the federal government to sign the most stringent ethics code ever adopted by any White House,” Psaki said.

When it is “necessary and in the public’s interest,” the order “authorizes agencies to grant limited waivers and consultation” with the White House counsel’s office, she said.

“The president, of course, has stood strong for unions throughout his career, and he’s proud to have leading labor voices in the White House,” Psaki continued. “And there are circumstances, very, very limited, where it is in the interest of governing and the interest of getting work done for the American people to issue these waivers.”

In March, Predeoux, a senior official at OPM was given a waiver to permit her to control communication between the government agency and the American Federation of Government Employees – a union representing 700,000 federal workers for whom she was previously a top lobbyist.

In April, the White House issued a similar waiver, permitting Drake, who leads the Made In America Office, to communicate with her former employers, the Director’s Guild of America and AFL-CIO.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Survey shows majority of Americans reject Build Back Better: More think Biden’s infrastructure spending bill will hurt them more than help them



In a total inversion of what Democrats had expected, Americans have dismissed the expensive framework bill with gigantic social projects incorporated into it. Another survey shows that more Americans repel the Democrats’ $1.75 trillion spending proposition than welcome it.

As indicated by another ABC News/Ipsos survey delivered on Sunday, public help for President Joe Biden’s bills to expand spending on framework and social projects has blurred.

The overview tracked down that 32% of Americans feel that the spending bills would hurt individuals like them if they became law, while 25% said they accept the bills would help them. Close to 66% (64%) of Republicans figure the bills would hurt individuals like them, and 29% of free thinkers feel something very similar. In spite of being the significant system of Biden’s administration, less than half of Democrats (47%) accept the two bills would help them.

A CBS News survey from recently tracked down that 36% of respondents said it would help them and their family versus 33% who said it would hurt their friends and family. The overview additionally said that 79% of review members said that expansion was brought about by supply and assembling issues after the pandemic and 66% said it was brought about by U.S. government strategy. “And when asked about potential causes of inflation right now, two-thirds cited U.S. government policy,” the outlet stated.

The poll showed that just 37% of Americans thought that Biden and the Democrats were centered around issues they care very much about.

This sad survey for Biden and the Democrats shows up on that very days as a NBC News review that shows the president at unsurpassed lows. The NBC News surveys found that Biden was submerged interestingly of his administration – 42% endorsement rating versus 54% who object.

The survey likewise showed that 71% said the nation is “off on the wrong track” – including 48% of Democrats.

“When you see a wrong track of 71%, it is a flashing red light,” Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies said. “These folks are telling us that this is not going well.”

That is a huge increment from one more survey in September that said 61% of Americans felt like the country has “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

Continue Reading


President Biden says the Pope advised him to continue to take communion and considered him a ‘good Catholic’



President Joe Biden said that Pope Francis let him know he was a “good Catholic” and said he could keep on taking communion regardless of the complaints of numerous U.S. bishops.

Biden made the case after a private gathering with the pontiff at the Vatican on Friday.

“We just talked about the fact he was happy that I was a good Catholic and I should keep receiving Communion,” Biden said about the gathering.

He added that the topic of abortion didn’t come up in the gathering.

An assertion from the White House showed that Biden said thanks to the Pope for pushing for an “equitable global economic recovery” and for battling global warming.

“Biden thanked His Holiness for his advocacy for the world’s poor and those suffering from hunger, conflict, and persecution,” the assertion added.

The Vatican didn’t affirm Biden’s case in their official statement about their gathering.

Biden’s claim will probably disappoint and outrage many conservative Catholics in the U.S. who have called for communion to be declined to politicians who stand behind abortion, which is in opposition to Catholic church teaching.

The issue will be taken up by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops following upon a vote during their June plenary meeting to address it generally. After Biden met with the Pope, they delivered an assertion saying that they would not single out a particular legislator if they vote to say something about the issue.

The Pope had recently reacted to the contention by approaching the diocesans to try not to politicize the congregation’s most elevated holy observance, which would transform it into a “source of discord rather than unity within the episcopate and the larger church in the United States.”

Here’s additional info on the gathering between the Pope and Biden:

Continue Reading


Gold Star father tears into Biden over supposed arrangement to give large installments to illegal migrant families



Gold Star father David Horton slammed President Joe Biden in a meeting Sunday, scrutinizing the Biden organization’s accounted for plan to convey huge financial installments to some migrant families.

The Wall Street Journal announced last week about the arrangement to pay migrant families affected by previous President Donald Trump’s zero-tolerance illegal immigration policies.

The Biden administration is in talks to offer immigrant families that were separated during the Trump administration around $450,000 a person in compensation, according to people familiar with the matter, as several agencies work to resolve lawsuits filed on behalf of parents and children who say the government subjected them to lasting psychological trauma.

The U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services are considering payments that could amount to close to $1 million a family, though the final numbers could shift, the people familiar with the matter said. Most of the families that crossed the border illegally from Mexico to seek asylum in the U.S. included one parent and one child, the people said. Many families would likely get smaller payouts, depending on their circumstances, the people said.

Among the issues pundits have raised with the arrangement, the greatest is that non-citizens remain to get additional cash from the U.S. government than gold star families if the arrangement becomes reality.

As of now, the U.S. government pays the group of fallen assistance individuals $100,000 in “death gratuity”; the installments are tax excluded. The families of service members additionally have the choice to gather a limit of $400,000 in extra security, however administration individuals need to pay into the protection intend to accept its advantages.

Speaking on “Fox and Friends,” Horton — whose son, Army Spc. Christopher Horton, was killed in Afghanistan in 2011 — proclaimed the Biden administration’s arrangement “an insult” and clarified it disrespects military families.

“I think it’s another — yet another insult … against our military families and Gold Star families and veterans’ families,” Horton said. “It’s just another another slap in the face. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“To compare an illegal person who has broken our country’s border laws … they’ve broken the law coming in on our borders and to compare that with someone, a patriot like my son, who gave his all on the battlefield of Afghanistan, and to just say, ‘Oh well, the value is more for someone who has broken our laws’ … and now to say, ‘Oh, we owe you money — and it’s more money than we would pay a patriot — I am outraged,” Horton said.

“You just wonder, where is the outcry against some of these policies that are just there? Unbelievable to me,” Horton added.

Continue Reading