Connect with us


Drone strike commanded by Biden’s Pentagon accidentally targeted innocent aid worker, killing ten Afghan civilians, even seven children



A U.S. military airstrike against a alleged terrorist in Afghanistan may have really killed an innocent man who worked for a United States aid group in Kabul and his family, a new report claimed.

The United States launched an airstrike on August 29th, just a day before the last American withdrawal flights leaving Kabul.

“U.S. military forces conducted a self-defense unmanned over-the-horizon airstrike today on a vehicle in Kabul, eliminating an imminent ISIS-K threat to [Hamid] Karzai International airport,” Capt. Bill Urban, a spokesman for United States Central Command, said the day of the bombing.

“We are confident we successfully hit the target,” Urban asserted. “Significant secondary explosions from the vehicle indicated the presence of a substantial amount of explosive material.”

“We are assessing the possibilities of civilian casualties, though we have no indications at this time,” he concluded. “We remain vigilant for potential future threats.”

On Aug. 30, Major General William Taylor told reporters, “U.S. military forces conducted an unmanned over-the-horizon air strike on a vehicle known to be an imminent ISIS-K threat. This self-defense strike successfully hit the target near Kabul airport. Significant secondary explosions from the targeted vehicle indicated the presence of a substantial amount of explosive material.”

On September 1st, Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said, “We had very good intelligence that ISIS-K was preparing a specific-type vehicle at a specific-type location. We monitored that through various means, and all of the engagement criteria were being met. We went through the same level of rigor that we’ve done for years.”

“I don’t want to influence the outcome of an investigation — but at this point we think that the procedures were correctly followed and it was a righteous strike,” Milley stated.

During an August 31th speech marking the end of almost two decades of United States military action in Afghanistan, President Biden bragged of the Kabul airstrike and the drone attack in the Nangarhar Province of Afghanistan.

“We struck ISIS-K remotely, days after they murdered 13 of our servicemembers and dozens of innocent Afghans. And to ISIS-K: We are not done with you yet,” Biden said in the White House State Dining Room.

However, a New York Times article rebutted the Biden administration’s account of what really happened during the Kabul airstrike, and stated that the airstrike killed an innocent family and not ISIS terrorists.

As stated in the report, drone operators began tracking a car that belonged to Zemari Ahmadi, a white Toyota Corolla, which is allegedly the same type of vehicle that ISIS militants drove to flee after launching rockets at the Kabul airport.

Recently released security camera footage shows Ahmadi filling containers with water at his employer’s office and putting them into his car. He was taking colleagues to and from work, and they were seen carrying laptop computers.

“According to his relatives, as Mr. Ahmadi pulled into his courtyard, several of his children and his brothers’ children came out, excited to see him, and sat in the car as he backed it inside,” the Times reported.

The United States military launched a Hellfire missile fired from a Reaper drone at the vehicle, thinking that it was being loaded with explosives for an strike on the airport.

“At first I thought it was the Taliban,” Samia Ahmadi, Ahmadi’s daughter who was inside the family’s home when the missile attack occurred, told the New York Times. “But the Americans themselves did it.”

“I saw the whole scene,” Samia Ahmadi said. “There were burnt pieces of flesh everywhere.”

Zemari Ahmadi and nine members of his family, including seven children, were killed by the drone strike, stated by his brother, Romal Ahmadi. The drone strike supposedly killed Ahmadi, three of his children, three of his brother’s children, two 3-year-old girls, and one of his cousins.

Samia’s fiancé, Ahmad Naser, a former army officer and contractor with the United States military, was supposedly among the ten that were killed in the drone strike.

The Pentagon said there were other explosions from the airstrike when explosive materials in the car burst into flames. However, the New York Times rebutted that claim.

“But an examination of the scene of the strike, conducted by the Times visual investigations team and a Times reporter the morning afterward, and followed up with a second visit four days later, found no evidence of a second, more powerful explosion,” the report stated.

Several weapons experts told the NYT that the small crater underneath the car was consistent with a Hellfire missile.

Zemari Ahmadi, who is thought to be the target of the drone strike, worked for fourteen years as a technical engineer in Afghanistan for the California-based non-governmental charity organization Nutrition and Education International, which helps feed starving Afghans.

Steven Kwon, the president of NEI, said Ahmadi “was well respected by his colleagues and compassionate towards the poor and needy,” and that he had recently “prepared and delivered soy-based meals to hungry women and children at local refugee camps in Kabul.”

The charity supposedly applied for him to go to the United States as a refugee.

The drone strike in Kabul happened several days after the suicide bomb strike at the Kabul airport that killed thirteen United States service members and 169 Afghans.

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby stood firm that the claim that the airstrike removed an “imminent threat.”

“U.S. Central Command continues to assess the results of the airstrike in Kabul on Aug. 29. We won’t get ahead of that assessment,” Kirby said. “However, as we have said, no other military works harder than we do to prevent civilian casualties.”

“Additionally, as Chairman Milley said, the strike was based on good intelligence, and we still believe that it prevented an imminent threat to the airport and to our men and women that were still serving at the airport,” he added.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Survey shows majority of Americans reject Build Back Better: More think Biden’s infrastructure spending bill will hurt them more than help them



In a total inversion of what Democrats had expected, Americans have dismissed the expensive framework bill with gigantic social projects incorporated into it. Another survey shows that more Americans repel the Democrats’ $1.75 trillion spending proposition than welcome it.

As indicated by another ABC News/Ipsos survey delivered on Sunday, public help for President Joe Biden’s bills to expand spending on framework and social projects has blurred.

The overview tracked down that 32% of Americans feel that the spending bills would hurt individuals like them if they became law, while 25% said they accept the bills would help them. Close to 66% (64%) of Republicans figure the bills would hurt individuals like them, and 29% of free thinkers feel something very similar. In spite of being the significant system of Biden’s administration, less than half of Democrats (47%) accept the two bills would help them.

A CBS News survey from recently tracked down that 36% of respondents said it would help them and their family versus 33% who said it would hurt their friends and family. The overview additionally said that 79% of review members said that expansion was brought about by supply and assembling issues after the pandemic and 66% said it was brought about by U.S. government strategy. “And when asked about potential causes of inflation right now, two-thirds cited U.S. government policy,” the outlet stated.

The poll showed that just 37% of Americans thought that Biden and the Democrats were centered around issues they care very much about.

This sad survey for Biden and the Democrats shows up on that very days as a NBC News review that shows the president at unsurpassed lows. The NBC News surveys found that Biden was submerged interestingly of his administration – 42% endorsement rating versus 54% who object.

The survey likewise showed that 71% said the nation is “off on the wrong track” – including 48% of Democrats.

“When you see a wrong track of 71%, it is a flashing red light,” Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies said. “These folks are telling us that this is not going well.”

That is a huge increment from one more survey in September that said 61% of Americans felt like the country has “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

Continue Reading


President Biden says the Pope advised him to continue to take communion and considered him a ‘good Catholic’



President Joe Biden said that Pope Francis let him know he was a “good Catholic” and said he could keep on taking communion regardless of the complaints of numerous U.S. bishops.

Biden made the case after a private gathering with the pontiff at the Vatican on Friday.

“We just talked about the fact he was happy that I was a good Catholic and I should keep receiving Communion,” Biden said about the gathering.

He added that the topic of abortion didn’t come up in the gathering.

An assertion from the White House showed that Biden said thanks to the Pope for pushing for an “equitable global economic recovery” and for battling global warming.

“Biden thanked His Holiness for his advocacy for the world’s poor and those suffering from hunger, conflict, and persecution,” the assertion added.

The Vatican didn’t affirm Biden’s case in their official statement about their gathering.

Biden’s claim will probably disappoint and outrage many conservative Catholics in the U.S. who have called for communion to be declined to politicians who stand behind abortion, which is in opposition to Catholic church teaching.

The issue will be taken up by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops following upon a vote during their June plenary meeting to address it generally. After Biden met with the Pope, they delivered an assertion saying that they would not single out a particular legislator if they vote to say something about the issue.

The Pope had recently reacted to the contention by approaching the diocesans to try not to politicize the congregation’s most elevated holy observance, which would transform it into a “source of discord rather than unity within the episcopate and the larger church in the United States.”

Here’s additional info on the gathering between the Pope and Biden:

Continue Reading


Gold Star father tears into Biden over supposed arrangement to give large installments to illegal migrant families



Gold Star father David Horton slammed President Joe Biden in a meeting Sunday, scrutinizing the Biden organization’s accounted for plan to convey huge financial installments to some migrant families.

The Wall Street Journal announced last week about the arrangement to pay migrant families affected by previous President Donald Trump’s zero-tolerance illegal immigration policies.

The Biden administration is in talks to offer immigrant families that were separated during the Trump administration around $450,000 a person in compensation, according to people familiar with the matter, as several agencies work to resolve lawsuits filed on behalf of parents and children who say the government subjected them to lasting psychological trauma.

The U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services are considering payments that could amount to close to $1 million a family, though the final numbers could shift, the people familiar with the matter said. Most of the families that crossed the border illegally from Mexico to seek asylum in the U.S. included one parent and one child, the people said. Many families would likely get smaller payouts, depending on their circumstances, the people said.

Among the issues pundits have raised with the arrangement, the greatest is that non-citizens remain to get additional cash from the U.S. government than gold star families if the arrangement becomes reality.

As of now, the U.S. government pays the group of fallen assistance individuals $100,000 in “death gratuity”; the installments are tax excluded. The families of service members additionally have the choice to gather a limit of $400,000 in extra security, however administration individuals need to pay into the protection intend to accept its advantages.

Speaking on “Fox and Friends,” Horton — whose son, Army Spc. Christopher Horton, was killed in Afghanistan in 2011 — proclaimed the Biden administration’s arrangement “an insult” and clarified it disrespects military families.

“I think it’s another — yet another insult … against our military families and Gold Star families and veterans’ families,” Horton said. “It’s just another another slap in the face. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“To compare an illegal person who has broken our country’s border laws … they’ve broken the law coming in on our borders and to compare that with someone, a patriot like my son, who gave his all on the battlefield of Afghanistan, and to just say, ‘Oh well, the value is more for someone who has broken our laws’ … and now to say, ‘Oh, we owe you money — and it’s more money than we would pay a patriot — I am outraged,” Horton said.

“You just wonder, where is the outcry against some of these policies that are just there? Unbelievable to me,” Horton added.

Continue Reading