Connect with us


Congress Seeks to Limit Biden’s War Powers



Congress appears ready to tackle presidential war powers after years of yielding to the executive branch.

Lawmakers on both sides have said it’s time to examine the extent of the president’s power and three previous authorizations for the use of military force, based on The Hill.

The matter is a messy one for some members in both major parties. Hawkish Republicans who disagree with President Joe Biden’s policies are leery of restricting presidential authority in terms of military use.

Other members want Congress to reassert itself on foreign policy.

“I think we’re overdue,” Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., stated.

“I think it’s important that we take this up, debate it, and pass something.”

The 1991 measure for the Gulf War.
The 2002 legislation passed for the Iraq War.
Lawmakers say the biggest challenge will be how to handle the 2001 authorization, approved by Congress just days after Sept. 11, 2001, to go after groups responsible for the terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.

That authorization since has been expanded to cover military operations in 19 countries and against groups that didn’t even exist on 9/11.

“What the replacement looks like, what are the contours of it, that is going to be the tricky part of that and the more difficult part,” said Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., said the 2001 AUMF should be “rewritten,” but that it would be hard to do.

“The administration seems open to revisiting some of those things, but admittedly the’01 AUMF will be much more ambitious than ditching the’02 and the’91,” Young said.

Proponents of earning changes have been encouraged by the Biden administration appearing to be open to revamping the military authorizations.

In a statement, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the administration was”committed to working with Congress to ensure that the authorizations for the use of military force currently on the books are replaced with a narrow and specific framework.”

Menendez and Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., stated they were in early discussions with government officials about rewriting the 2001 authorization.

Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., stated the 2001 authorization was”misused” and no longer was”functional.”

“You’re going to have to get the president to take on White House counsel to do what’s right because White House counsel will tell a president,’Why do you wish to limit your choices?'” Said Cardin, who added that there could be”significant Republican opposition,” but that he thought there might be support for a”reasonable” authorization.

“I think we’re now so many years into this war [on terror] that the American public, I think, is reflecting a view that’s having an impact on the traditional views of some of the members of the Senate,” he said.

However, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. , told The Washington Post he thought the debate about previous authorizations could”incentivize the rise of terrorism.”

Progressive lawmakers would love to see the 2001 AUMF expire unless Congress acted to expand it, and they want stricter guidelines on how the military could be used.

Democrats accountable for changing the AUMFs hope they’ll be able to pick up at least 10 GOP votes in the Senate on a 2001 rewrite.

The 1991 and 2002 AUMFs appeared less problematic.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee voted late last week to repeal the 2002 authorization, with two Republicans joining with Democrats on the panel.

A bipartisan Senate group introduced legislation to repeal the 1991 and 2002 authorizations. Menendez indicated he intended to take them up”sooner rather than later,” but declined to provide a specific timeline.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Survey shows majority of Americans reject Build Back Better: More think Biden’s infrastructure spending bill will hurt them more than help them



In a total inversion of what Democrats had expected, Americans have dismissed the expensive framework bill with gigantic social projects incorporated into it. Another survey shows that more Americans repel the Democrats’ $1.75 trillion spending proposition than welcome it.

As indicated by another ABC News/Ipsos survey delivered on Sunday, public help for President Joe Biden’s bills to expand spending on framework and social projects has blurred.

The overview tracked down that 32% of Americans feel that the spending bills would hurt individuals like them if they became law, while 25% said they accept the bills would help them. Close to 66% (64%) of Republicans figure the bills would hurt individuals like them, and 29% of free thinkers feel something very similar. In spite of being the significant system of Biden’s administration, less than half of Democrats (47%) accept the two bills would help them.

A CBS News survey from recently tracked down that 36% of respondents said it would help them and their family versus 33% who said it would hurt their friends and family. The overview additionally said that 79% of review members said that expansion was brought about by supply and assembling issues after the pandemic and 66% said it was brought about by U.S. government strategy. “And when asked about potential causes of inflation right now, two-thirds cited U.S. government policy,” the outlet stated.

The poll showed that just 37% of Americans thought that Biden and the Democrats were centered around issues they care very much about.

This sad survey for Biden and the Democrats shows up on that very days as a NBC News review that shows the president at unsurpassed lows. The NBC News surveys found that Biden was submerged interestingly of his administration – 42% endorsement rating versus 54% who object.

The survey likewise showed that 71% said the nation is “off on the wrong track” – including 48% of Democrats.

“When you see a wrong track of 71%, it is a flashing red light,” Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies said. “These folks are telling us that this is not going well.”

That is a huge increment from one more survey in September that said 61% of Americans felt like the country has “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

Continue Reading


President Biden says the Pope advised him to continue to take communion and considered him a ‘good Catholic’



President Joe Biden said that Pope Francis let him know he was a “good Catholic” and said he could keep on taking communion regardless of the complaints of numerous U.S. bishops.

Biden made the case after a private gathering with the pontiff at the Vatican on Friday.

“We just talked about the fact he was happy that I was a good Catholic and I should keep receiving Communion,” Biden said about the gathering.

He added that the topic of abortion didn’t come up in the gathering.

An assertion from the White House showed that Biden said thanks to the Pope for pushing for an “equitable global economic recovery” and for battling global warming.

“Biden thanked His Holiness for his advocacy for the world’s poor and those suffering from hunger, conflict, and persecution,” the assertion added.

The Vatican didn’t affirm Biden’s case in their official statement about their gathering.

Biden’s claim will probably disappoint and outrage many conservative Catholics in the U.S. who have called for communion to be declined to politicians who stand behind abortion, which is in opposition to Catholic church teaching.

The issue will be taken up by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops following upon a vote during their June plenary meeting to address it generally. After Biden met with the Pope, they delivered an assertion saying that they would not single out a particular legislator if they vote to say something about the issue.

The Pope had recently reacted to the contention by approaching the diocesans to try not to politicize the congregation’s most elevated holy observance, which would transform it into a “source of discord rather than unity within the episcopate and the larger church in the United States.”

Here’s additional info on the gathering between the Pope and Biden:

Continue Reading


Gold Star father tears into Biden over supposed arrangement to give large installments to illegal migrant families



Gold Star father David Horton slammed President Joe Biden in a meeting Sunday, scrutinizing the Biden organization’s accounted for plan to convey huge financial installments to some migrant families.

The Wall Street Journal announced last week about the arrangement to pay migrant families affected by previous President Donald Trump’s zero-tolerance illegal immigration policies.

The Biden administration is in talks to offer immigrant families that were separated during the Trump administration around $450,000 a person in compensation, according to people familiar with the matter, as several agencies work to resolve lawsuits filed on behalf of parents and children who say the government subjected them to lasting psychological trauma.

The U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services are considering payments that could amount to close to $1 million a family, though the final numbers could shift, the people familiar with the matter said. Most of the families that crossed the border illegally from Mexico to seek asylum in the U.S. included one parent and one child, the people said. Many families would likely get smaller payouts, depending on their circumstances, the people said.

Among the issues pundits have raised with the arrangement, the greatest is that non-citizens remain to get additional cash from the U.S. government than gold star families if the arrangement becomes reality.

As of now, the U.S. government pays the group of fallen assistance individuals $100,000 in “death gratuity”; the installments are tax excluded. The families of service members additionally have the choice to gather a limit of $400,000 in extra security, however administration individuals need to pay into the protection intend to accept its advantages.

Speaking on “Fox and Friends,” Horton — whose son, Army Spc. Christopher Horton, was killed in Afghanistan in 2011 — proclaimed the Biden administration’s arrangement “an insult” and clarified it disrespects military families.

“I think it’s another — yet another insult … against our military families and Gold Star families and veterans’ families,” Horton said. “It’s just another another slap in the face. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“To compare an illegal person who has broken our country’s border laws … they’ve broken the law coming in on our borders and to compare that with someone, a patriot like my son, who gave his all on the battlefield of Afghanistan, and to just say, ‘Oh well, the value is more for someone who has broken our laws’ … and now to say, ‘Oh, we owe you money — and it’s more money than we would pay a patriot — I am outraged,” Horton said.

“You just wonder, where is the outcry against some of these policies that are just there? Unbelievable to me,” Horton added.

Continue Reading